Nanoplastics Released from Single-Use PET Bottles Pose a Threat to Human Health: INST Mohali Study
 
  • Mobile Menu
HOME BUY MAGAZINEnew course icon
LOG IN SIGN UP

Sign-Up IcanDon't Have an Account?


SIGN UP

 

Login Icon

Have an Account?


LOG IN
 

or
By clicking on Register, you are agreeing to our Terms & Conditions.
 
 
 

or
 
 




Nanoplastics Released from Single-Use PET Bottles Pose a Threat to Human Health: INST Mohali Study

Thu 04 Dec, 2025

Reference:

  • According to a study conducted by scientists at the Institute of Nano Science and Technology (INST), Mohali, nanoplastics released from single-use PET bottles damage gut bacteria and human cells.

Key Points:

  • Team: The study was led by Prof. Manish Singh, Prashant Sharma, and Sakshi Dagaria from the Chemical Biology Unit of INST.
  • Objective: To understand the biological impacts of nanoplastics (PBNPs) released from single-use PET bottles, particularly on the gut microbiome, blood cells, and general cellular responses.

Process:

  • INST prepared nanoplastics (50–850 nanometers) from PET bottles in the laboratory to replicate real environmental conditions.
  • These nanoplastics were tested on three biological models:
  • Lactobacillus rhamnosus: A beneficial gut probiotic bacterium.
  • Red Blood Cells: To assess blood compatibility.
  • A549 Human Epithelial Cells: A model for general cellular responses.

Impact on Gut Bacteria (Gut Microbiome)

Effects on Lactobacillus rhamnosus:

  • Reduced Growth: Exposure for 16 days caused dose- and time-dependent reductions in bacterial viability and proliferation.
  • Membrane Damage: Confocal microscopy confirmed damage to bacterial membranes.
  • Decline in Protective Functions: Antioxidant and antibacterial activities decreased, affecting the bacterium’s ability to protect the gut.
  • Biofilm & Autoaggregation: Nanoplastics increased biofilm formation and autoaggregation, indicating dysbiosis.
  • Antibiotic Sensitivity: Increased sensitivity to antibiotics, complicating antibiotic resistance (AR) dynamics.
  • Reduced Colonization: Adhesion to colon epithelial cells decreased, reducing colonization capability.

Spread of Antibiotic Resistance (AR):

  • Nanoplastics promote AR gene transfer through two mechanisms:
  • Direct Transformation: PBNPs transport AR plasmids across bacterial membranes, enabling gene transfer from E. coli to L. acidophilus.
  • OMV-Induced Transfer: Nanoplastics trigger oxidative stress and membrane damage, activating stress genes and increasing secretion of outer membrane vesicles (OMVs).
  • These OMVs carry AR genes and transfer them to unrelated bacteria.
  • This mechanism may turn beneficial bacteria into reservoirs of AR genes, which may later transfer to pathogenic bacteria, intensifying the global AR crisis.

Impact on Human Cells

Red Blood Cells:

  • At high concentrations, nanoplastics caused membrane damage and hemolytic changes (premature cell destruction).
  • This may affect oxygen-carrying capacity and overall blood stability, potentially leading to anemia-like conditions.

A549 Epithelial Cells:

Short-term exposure:

  • Minimal effects observed.
  • Long-term exposure:
  • DNA Damage: Genotoxic effects leading to DNA damage (γH2AX marker).
  • Oxidative Stress: Increased reactive oxygen species (ROS), causing cellular damage.
  • Apoptosis: Increased markers of programmed cell death.
  • Inflammation: Enhanced pro-inflammatory signaling (IL-6, TNF-α), potentially causing chronic inflammation.
  • Metabolic Changes: Alterations in glucose metabolism, amino acid balance, and lipid pathways affecting energy and nutrient metabolism.
  • Mutagenic Potential: No direct mutagenicity in Ames test, but mutagenic potential increased after metabolic activation, indicating bioactivation-dependent genotoxicity.

Characteristics and Risks of Nanoplastics:

  •  
  • Size & Bioavailability: PBNPs (50–850 nm) are small enough to penetrate cell membranes, gut walls, and tissues. They may be 1000 times more toxic than microplastics.
  • Trojan Horse Effect: Nanoplastics carry harmful chemicals (phthalates, bisphenols, heavy metals), increasing toxicity.
  • Environmental Relevance: INST generated nanoplastics from real PET bottles, replicating environmental pollutants more accurately.
  • PET bottles release nanoplastics through sunlight exposure, heat, and mechanical stress.
  • Antibiotic Resistance Risk: Nanoplastics promote AR gene spread, worsening global health challenges.

Plastics

  • Plastics are a broad category of synthetic or semi-synthetic organic compounds used to make various products.
  • The word “plastic” comes from the Greek word plastikos, meaning “capable of being molded.”

Classification of Plastics

Based on Structure:

Thermoplastics:

  • Soften on heating and harden on cooling; the process is reversible.
  • Ideal for recycling.
  • Examples: Polyethylene (PE), Polypropylene (PP), Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC), Polystyrene (PS), PET.

Thermosetting Plastics:

  • Become permanently hard upon heating; cannot be softened again.
  • Difficult to recycle.
  • Examples: Bakelite, Melamine, Epoxy resins.

Types of Plastics and Recycling Codes (Resin Identification Codes):

These codes help identify plastics based on their chemical composition for recycling purposes.

Code Abbreviation Full Name Common Uses
1 PET or PETE Polyethylene Terephthalate Water/soda bottles, food jars, clothing fibers
2 HDPE High-Density Polyethylene Milk bottles, detergent containers, toys
3 PVC Polyvinyl Chloride Pipes, window frames, cable insulation, medical devices
4 LDPE Low-Density Polyethylene Plastic bags, wrapping films, squeeze bottles
5 PP Polypropylene Yogurt containers, medicine bottles, microwave containers, car parts
6 PS Polystyrene Disposable cups, foam packaging, cutlery
7 OTHER Other Polycarbonate (PC), nylon, mixed plastics

 

Latest Courses